KELEBIHAN DAN KEKURANGAN DHCP Kelebihan 1.Memudahkan dalam transfer data kepada PC client lain atau PC server. Menyediakan alamat-alamat IP secara dinamis dan konfigurasi lain. 2.DHCP memungkinkan suatu client menggunakan alamat IP yang tidal bisa dipakai oleh client.

AndroidUse Android to Provide Remote SupportConnectWise Control allows a technician to access and control Mac, Windows, or Linux machines from an Android device. Technicians can reboot and reconnect, manage credentials, chat, and much more. ConnectWise Control mobile client can be downloaded free from the.Support Android DevicesConnectWise Control also provides limited support for most Android devices and full remote support for Android tablets and phones manufactured by Samsung. While Samsung provides the most comprehensive access for ConnectWise Control, other devices can also be supported in a view only mode, allowing techs to assist and chat with guests. IOSUse iOS to Provide Remote SupportConnectWise Control supports the use of all iOS devices to support remote guests.

Connect to Windows, Mac, or Linux machines. App features include central toolbox, quality settings, reboot and reconnect, manage credentials, chat and much more. ConnectWise Control mobile client can be downloaded free from the.Support iOS DevicesTechnicians can now support iOS devices using ConnectWise Control.

Co-browse, review diagnostic information, scan the photo gallery, and stream video from iOS mobile devices.

The $400 to $500 USD price range is unsurprisingly home to some slow laptops. While this is not a major issue for the target audience, even we have standards on how slow a laptop can be before it becomes unacceptable and not recommendable. The X555DA and its AMD A10-8700P APU straddle that line with an under-performing processor and washed out 1080p display as our tests and measurements below will show.The X555DA retains the core chassis and design features of the older X555LD and X555LN Intel SKUs, so we recommend checking out our two existing review pages for more information on the hardware. Other AMD APUs are also available on the X555DA series including the slower and the faster. The case remains largely unchanged from the old X555LN with only minor visual updates. The plastic outer lid, for example, is now a glossy bright red with more rounded edges and corners. Other colors are available as well including green and gray with the same glossy sheen.

While attractive when new and clean, the surface scratches easily and fingerprints accumulate very quickly.Case quality is average as the plastic base creaks only slightly when twisting or depressing its surfaces. The chassis is a bit weaker on its right half and NumPad area due to the hollow optical bay underneath. The lid is perhaps the most disappointing as it flexes easily and even creaks simply by opening or closing.

Its outer surface warps easily to pressure and the bar hinge teeters for far too long when adjusting the angle of the display. While it's unrealistic to expect a very sturdy lid from a notebook in this price range, it's the one aspect of the chassis that could use the most improvement.

KeyboardThe plastic keyboard keys are slightly roughened in texture and do not wiggle or clatter significantly when pressed. Travel is shallow as expected, but feedback is soft mainly because the keyboard base warps easily to pressure especially towards its center. Simply typing will bend the area around the keys slightly, so the chassis could have benefited from a more rigid base to improve the typing experience. There are no backlight options as is common on budget laptops. TouchpadThe trackpad (10.5 x 7.3 cm) feels much more solid than the keyboard with its smooth glide and responsiveness.

The onscreen cursor will not jitter even at low speeds and multi-touch controls are generally reliable. The integrated mouse keys are shallow in travel with firm auditory feedback when pressed.

Travel could have been more rigid, however, as there is some 'give' to the touchpad surface before the system will register a click.It's worth noting that the trackpad on our test unit is not completely flat; its surface sinks slightly more on the left half than the right half. This doesn't appear to impact the functionality of the trackpad, but it has us questioning the quality control of this particular aspect of the X555DA series. The 1080p panel on our X555DA is a stark improvement over the poor 768p panel on our older X555LN. Contrast and brightness are now more in line with what we expect from a notebook of this price range at around 500:1 and 230 nits, respectively.

This AU Optronics B156HTN03.8 TN panel is common on many budget and mid-range 15.6-inch notebooks including the, and the.Subjectively, colors are muted and not nearly as vivid as the displays of most Ultrabooks. Contrast is still very weak and the backlight is sufficient only for indoor use. The low contrast and narrow color gamut make for an overall below average experience even if texts and images appear sharp resolution-wise. The A10-8700P occupies an awkward performance zone between the passively-cooled Intel Cherry Trail and the older Haswell. This makes the AMD processor very slow for general PC tasks but still at a level much higher than the Intel Atom. The entry-level Surface Pro 4 SKU with its CPU can still outperform our AMD APU in raw CPU tasks by as much as 15 to 40 percent according to CineBench benchmarks. This is made even more disappointing by the fact that the A10-8700P is a 12 W to 35 W cTDP APU compared to just 4.5 W for the Intel m3-6Y30.To AMD's credit, the Asus system shows no signs of CPU performance throttling when running CineBench R15 Multi-Thread on a loop.

The initial score of 180 points remains very steady after more than an hour of running the benchmark non-stop. Our test unit is equipped with a single SATA III Seagate HDD with no other secondary internal storage options. Transfer rates average 78.8 MB/s according to HD Tune, which is average for a 5400 RPM drive and noticeably slower than most 7200 RPM HDDs where 95+ MB/s is common. The latest NVMe SSDs on newer Ultrabooks are over an order of a magnitude faster than what is offered here.Upgrading the hard drive requires a Philips screwdriver and a flat edge, but the keyboard panel can be tricky to remove due to connecting ribbons underneath. The 2.5-inch slot accepts both 7 mm and 9.5 mm drives.See our of HDDs and SSDs for additional benchmarks and comparisons.

We stress the notebook with synthetic benchmarks to identify for any throttling or stability issues. When under Prime95 stress, the CPU can be observed alternating between its base 1.8 GHz and Turbo 2.1 GHz clock rates. While the CPU does not drop below the base clock rate, it's disappointing that it can neither maintain consistent Turbo clock rates. Running both Prime95 and FurMark will throttle the CPU and GPU to 1.3 GHz and 433 MHz, respectively. The CPU temperature ceiling appears to be very reserved at the low 50 C range no matter the processing load.Running on battery power will not limit CPU or GPU power. A 3DMark 11 run on batteries returns Physics and Graphics scores of 2172 and 1350 points, respectively, compared to 2069 and 1288 points when on mains. The internal fan is always active no matter the onscreen load or system setting.

What's worse is that it appears to pulsate in low ranges between 31.6 dB(A) and 32.4 dB(A) which makes an otherwise quiet machine more noticeable during use. A steady fan noise of 32.4 dB(A), for example, would have been preferable and less of an annoyance than a fan that is constantly changing in speeds.More stressful conditions such as 3DMark or Prime95 will induce a louder fan noise in the 33.3 dB(A) to 35.5 dB(A) range. This is significantly quieter than the X555LN since the X555DA has no dedicated GPU to cool, so this is perhaps one area that the AMD SKU excels at. Nonetheless, similarly-sized competitors with Intel ULV solutions can run even quieter under similar conditions with less frequent pulsing. Surface temperatures when idling are flat across the palm rests and right-hand side of the notebook. Most of the QWERTY keys, however, will feel comparatively warmer at about 30 C compared to 23 C or 24 C on the palm rests. Not coincidentally, the processor and heat pipe are directly underneath this zone.

Maximum load with both Prime95 and FurMark will induce a surface temperature of almost 37 C on the keyboard keys, which is still a comfortable range for typing and not any warmer than the Intel-based Toshiba Satellite Pro 50-C when under similar loads. Waste heat exhausts through the ventilation grilles on the rear of the unit as shown by the very warm 47 C hinge on our temperature maps below. The RAM module becomes especially warm when under load at about 45 C. Asus X555DA-BB11 audio analysis(±) speaker loudness is average but good (76.36 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median(±) linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. Frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median(±) linearity of mids is average (14.6% delta to prev. Frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) higher highs - on average 7.2% higher than median(±) linearity of highs is average (14.6% delta to prev.

Frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) linearity of overall sound is average (26.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 89% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 8% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 19%, worst was 41%Compared to all devices tested» 79% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 15% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%. Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis(+) speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median(±) linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev.

About This GameEador is a universe made of countless shards of land drifting in the Great Nothing. Eador masters of the broken world astral energy cheat engine. Each of the shards is a little world unto itself, with geography and denizens of its own.

Frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median(+) mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. Frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) balanced highs - only 2% away from median(+) highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. Frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 8%, average was 20%, worst was 50%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 53%. The outdated Carrizo platform is not nearly as efficient as even the older Asus X555LN with the ULV CPU. Idling on desktop will draw 8.3 W up to as much as 13 W when idling on the High Performance profile.

3DMark loads will demand about 31 W compared to 19 W on the Toshiba Satellite Pro with the HD Graphics 520 GPU or 35 W on the older Asus X555LN model with the superior GeForce 840M GPU.Maximum load with both Prime95 and FurMark will draw 44 W from the small 65 W power adapter (7.5 x 7.5 x 3.0 cm). Runtimes are very disappointing at just under 3 hours of real-world WLAN use when on the Balanced profile setting and on a screen brightness of 150 nits (setting 75/10). The Satellite Pro R50-C can last for over twice as long under the same conditions and even the Lenovo Ideapad 110 can outlast our Asus with a much smaller internal battery capacity. We recommend running on the Power Saver profile if only using the system for media playback or general word processing in order to extend battery life as much as possible.Charging from near empty to full capacity will take just over two hours. The X555DA is a difficult recommendation especially when the older Intel-equipped X555LN or X555LD SKUs can outperform and outlast our AMD equivalent. Normally when the hardware is slower and cheaper, users are more likely to expect longer battery life and lower core temperatures to compensate.

The X555DA is the worst of both worlds as both performance and battery life are below average.Outside of the slow AMD APU, the Asus hardware suffers from its own series of issues. The lid and keyboard base flex too easily for our liking and the 1080p TN display has very poor color reproduction. Interested users will be better off with previously released ULV Broadwell or even Haswell notebooks than what Asus has to offer in this AMD SKU.This notebook fails as an inexpensive primary consumer PC because of its short battery life, poor display, and slow performance. Intel alternatives dating as far back as three or four years will still give more bang for the buck on nearly every aspect there is to offer. After graduating with a B.S. In environmental hydrodynamics from the University of California, I studied reactor physics to become licensed by the U.S.

NRC to operate nuclear reactors. There's a striking level of appreciation you gain for everyday consumer electronics after working with modern nuclear reactivity systems astonishingly powered by computers from the 80s. When I'm not managing day-to-day activities and US review articles on Notebookcheck, you can catch me following the eSports scene and the latest gaming news.